🧭 What the CFTC Actually Did
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Market Participants Division has issued a conditional no-action position for qualifying providers of passive trading software. In its September 17 announcement, the agency said it extends Phantom Technologies’ March approach. Letter 26-25 says similarly situated providers may receive protection from enforcement recommendations tied to introducing broker and associated-person registration, provided they meet its conditions.
That scope matters because a wallet or app can sit close to a regulated trading flow without becoming the venue, broker, or custodian. The letter covers software that lets a user view market data, product information, and aggregate positions, then send an order directly to a registered futures commission merchant, introducing broker, or designated contract market. The actual staff letter names event contracts and perpetual contracts among the derivatives that can be presented through the interface. It is narrow regulatory relief for a defined operating model, not blanket permission to offer derivatives.
🧩 Why Introducing Broker Status Is the Issue
An introducing broker generally solicits or accepts derivatives orders without taking customer funds to support them. The CFTC has long read those terms broadly, creating a hard question for software makers whose products connect users with regulated markets. A front end that markets a trading relationship, presents contracts, and transports an order can look more involved than a conventional technology vendor, even when it never holds the customer’s assets.
Letter 26-25 responds to that gap before a broader rule or guidance arrives. It says staff will not recommend an enforcement action solely because a qualifying passive software provider performs the covered activities without registering as an introducing broker, or because relevant personnel do not register as associated persons. As Decrypt’s account of the letter notes, the result could give crypto applications a clearer path to regulated derivatives infrastructure. The CFTC’s framing is more precise: the relief applies only until effective Commission rulemaking or guidance addresses the registration requirement for software developers.
📱 The Passive Software Boundary
The line that matters is whether the software stays passive. Under the covered model, the provider supplies front-end software on the user’s device. The user transmits orders directly to a registrant, while funds or property supporting derivatives positions remain with the clearing organization or a futures commission merchant. A wallet may embed the interface, but it must clearly distinguish when the user is entering a Commission-regulated activity.
The limits are equally important. The provider cannot hold, control, or take custody of user assets. It cannot have affirmative involvement with a particular order, generate express buy or sell signals, or exercise discretion over routing or execution. Those limits turn the feature into a conduit rather than a trading intermediary. Cointelegraph’s report describes the position as relief for passive providers, a useful shorthand that should not obscure the operational detail. A product team adding recommendations, smart order routing, or custody would need to reassess the letter’s fit before assuming the same treatment applies.
📋 Conditions Are the Price of Relief
The no-action position is paired with a substantial compliance list. Providers must disclose their relationships with registrants, including potential conflicts and fees, and users must acknowledge receipt. They also need risk disclosures modeled on the risks in CFTC Regulation 1.55(b) when the connected registrant does not already owe that disclosure duty. Users must be onboarded as direct members of a designated contract market or customers of a registered intermediary, and they must retain the ability to access that registrant independently.
Marketing also remains under a regulatory lens. The provider must adopt public-communications policies as though it were a registered introducing broker and cannot run advertising requiring National Futures Association preapproval. Letter 26-25 requires records consistent with CFTC rules, notice if the provider becomes insolvent or enters bankruptcy, and a notice accepting the conditions and CFTC jurisdiction. This is not a light-touch exemption. It shifts work from registration to proving that the permitted software model and its safeguards are in place.
🤝 Registrants Keep Skin in the Game
The staff letter does not isolate the software maker from the regulated firms it connects to. Each provider and relevant registrant must execute and file a written undertaking that makes them jointly and severally liable for violations of the Commodity Exchange Act or CFTC regulations arising from covered activities. Both consent to CFTC investigation and enforcement in connection with that activity. That structure gives a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, or exchange an incentive to evaluate the software partner’s controls.
It also explains why independent access is more than a checkbox. The CFTC wants the customer’s regulated relationship to exist independently of the interface, while the provider can market its service and may receive revenue share or charge a transaction-based fee. In the release announcing the position, the agency says the relief concerns provision and marketing of software that facilitates trading with registered intermediaries and designated contract markets. The registered entity remains central to onboarding, custody of trading collateral, and accountability.
🔍 What Investors Should Watch Next
For users, the immediate practical change may be more regulated derivatives entry points inside familiar crypto software. That could make event contracts, perpetuals, and other products easier to discover, but it does not make them simpler or less risky. A user should identify the actual registered counterparty, read the risk disclosure, understand where collateral is held, and know whether a wallet is merely displaying an order flow or doing something more active.
For investors following the sector, the durable signal is that CFTC staff is testing a way to separate passive user-interface software from broker-like activity. The letter is fact-specific, represents the Division’s views rather than a binding Commission rule, and can be modified, suspended, terminated, or restricted. Its scope is not limited to crypto-related software. The precedent is meaningful but provisional. The companies most likely to benefit are those prepared to build around direct access, clear disclosures, records, and shared accountability while avoiding features that could move them into regulated intermediation.
Sources
https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9300-26
https://www.cftc.gov/csl/26-25/download
https://decrypt.co/378560/cftc-crypto-apps-regulated-derivatives-access
https://cointelegraph.com/news/cftc-expands-regulatory-relief-for-passive-trading-software-providers
Crypto Club and Mode Mobile communications are for informational purposes only, and are not a recommendation, solicitation, or research report relating to any investment strategy, security, or digital asset. All investments involve risk including the loss of principal and past performance does not guarantee future results.
Any information contained in this commentary does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. There is no guarantee that any statements or opinions provided herein will prove to be correct.
Get fresh insights, breaking news, and hidden gems in the world of crypto—delivered straight to your inbox with our Crypto Cookies newsletter.
Don’t miss out—sign up now and get your first bite of insider knowledge!
